If she has been debating it for years as she claims, she ought to know that speaking in such a way is just an inflammatory thing to do. On a pedantic level she compares copyright infringement to physical theft, which is sure to aggravate anyone in the piracy debate and should be avoided. The top-rated answer, by Dana Holt, presents a good argument but there are problems with her post. I don't really have the inclination to read every single post and comment in that large thread, but I read the question and some of the highest-ranked answers. Though admittedly in this case the PSJailbreak developers did more of the work than you'd normally expect (usually, homebrew is well on its way before piracy companies start using it). Given the timing involved, I think we can safely say that the PSJailbreak piracy device wouldn't have happened had Sony not pulled OtherOS and prompted homebrew hackers to start breaking into the system, paving the way for thorough analysis. The PS3 has doubtlessly been under attack from would-be piracy companies since its release. These early homebrew hacks started off as a response to Sony pulling OtherOS from the Slim and ballooned after Sony illegitimately pulled OtherOS from all existing consoles. The USB exploit was discovered and used by a piracy company/manufacturer, but it is practically guaranteed that they built off of the then-early homebrew hacks for its development (the geohot glitching exploit and xorloser's xorhack toolkit, to name a couple), even though the final product was condensed down to a piracy device.

Psp custom firmware ps3 controller